NHLBI Workshop
Data Needs for Cardiovascular Events, Management, and Outcomes
Small Working Group: Out-of-Hospital Surveillance - Dr.
Joseph Ornato, Group Leader
What we need to track
- Sudden cardiac death
- Stroke
- Acute & chronic coronary syndromes
- Myocardial infarction
- Unstable angina
- Stable angina
- Heart failure
Where we need to track CVD data
- Emergency medical services (EMS)
- Office/clinic setting
- Emergency department
- Observation visits
- Deaths before entry into healthcare system
Where we want to be in 10 years
- Coordinated, cost-effective system of CVD surveillance that has core
data (i.e., counts) on national level, more detail at state & local
levels
- Provides a return on investment
- Uniform data definitions & data transfer standards
- Required, automatic population of data from electronic medical record
(EMR) systems
Major Gaps
- No one entity owns the problem
- Paucity of electronic data & linkages
- Out of hospital vs. in-hospital
- Agency to agency, entity to entity
- Paucity of CVD incidence & outcome rates
- No uniform healthcare identifier
- No public mandate to share the data
Optimizing Existing Data Systems
- Look at other models as examples
- Inventory & map existing data systems
- Require compliance with data standards (e.g., HL7, PHIN) for federal
funding
- Need national coordinating entity
- Need to test & validate existing data
Need new data strategies or optimize existing?
- Combination of both
- Need to accelerate EMR infrastructure
- Need uniform healthcare identifier
- Could benefit from new technologies such as health information data
cards
- Make CVD a reportable disease as records become electronic
Immediate Steps
- Inventory & map existing data systems
- Stakeholder meeting to develop a vision document
- Similar to EMS Agenda of the Future
- Establish who should lead the effort
- Establish a strategy for achieving the vision
- Continue to standardize disease and outcome definitions, incorporating
standard vocabulary amenable to electronic capture
- Link current databases from federal, state, local, and private institutions
- Could require institutional compliance with electronic data standards before
providing federal funding to grantees/contractors
Long Term Steps
- National uniform healthcare identifier
- National uniform definitions for reporting clinical data on CVD
- Make CVD encounters reportable as electronic medical record systems
become operational
Where we want to be in 10 years
- Coordinated, cost-effective system of CVD surveillance that has core
data (i.e., counts) on national level, more detail at state & local
levels
- Provides a return on investment
- Uniform data definitions & data transfer standards
- Required, automatic population of data from electronic medical record
systems
Back to Workshop Agenda
|