NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES
September 9, 2008
I. CALL TO ORDER AND OPENING REMARKS - Dr. Elizabeth G. Nabel
Dr. Elizabeth Nabel, Director of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), welcomed members to the 231st meeting of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council (NHLBAC). Because the September Council meeting was brief, most members participated via video-conference or telephone.
New Staff:
Dr. Nabel announced that Dr. Keith Hoots will join the Institute in January to become the Director in the Division of Blood Diseases and Resources. Dr. Hoots is currently Professor of Pediatrics and Division Head, Pediatric Hematology, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston; Section Head, Pediatric Hematology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; and Medical Director, Gulf State Hemophilia and Thrombophilia Treatment Center. Dr. Hoots is a past president of the Hemophilia Research Society of North America.
[Top of Page]
II. REVIEW OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST – Dr. Elizabeth G. Nabel
The Council was reminded that under Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, a portion of the meeting would be closed to the public, for the consideration of grant applications. Dr. Nabel also reminded the Council members that they are Special Government Employees and are subject to Departmental conduct regulations.
[Top of Page]
III. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR – Dr. Elizabeth G. Nabel
Budget Update:
Dr. Nabel reported that the Institute's payline for traditional research project grants (R01s) is at the 16th percentile as we approach the end of FY 2008; at the 26th percentile for new investigators' R01s (if expedited administrative review resolves summary statement comments); and at the 21st percentile for first-time renewal R01 applications from new investigators. This year, the Institute was able to fund program project grants with a composite priority score of 150 or better (subprojects with a score of 170 or better); career development grants with a score of 165 or better; and training grants with a score of 172 or better. Furthermore, in keeping with its efforts to support new investigators, the Institute was able to fund fellowship grants to the 40th percentile. Dr. Nabel noted that the Institute's funding scores have remained fairly stable over the last 3 to 4 years.
In FY 2008, the NIH received a $150 million supplement from Congress, of which the NHLBI share was $15.5 million. The NHLBI used 56 percent of its share to fund competing research project grants (RPGs) and was able to fund, in percentile order, 13 original (unamended) grant applications with percentile scores outside the regular payline.
Global Health Program:
The Institute recently reviewed its global health program in light of the major impact of chronic disease worldwide. In response to the recommendations of an Advisory Group convened by Dr. Nabel, the Institute has embarked on several activities:
- Requesting that the Institute of Medicine update its report on the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease worldwide.
- Partnering with the Fogarty International Center at the NIH, together with other Institutes/Centers, to support bilateral training programs.
- Looking into a role for the Institute in programs that target chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases in developing countries, focusing on training, surveillance, risk assessment, and primary prevention.
Related Policy Issues:
Dr. Nabel reported on two policy issues recently reviewed at the NIH. She welcomed feedback from Council.
- Amended Applications : After review of recommendations from the recent NIH-led study of its peer review system, the NIH has decided to consider phasing out second amendments (A2s) to competing RPG applications.
- Early-stage Investigators : The NIH is discussing how to focus support more effectively toward early-stage investigators, having found that a substantial portion of the new investigators it has recently supported (i.e., those who met the NIH criteria for "new investigators") were not early-stage investigators, but rather experienced researchers established in other fields of science. Under consideration is establishing policy to maintain equal success rates for both groups—early-stage and established investigators.
Council members offered opinions and suggestions on both issues.
CLOSED PORTION
This portion of the meeting was closed to the public in accordance with the determination that it concerned matters exempt from mandatory disclosure under Sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S. Code and Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2).
The session included a discussion of procedures and policies regarding voting and confidentiality of application materials, committee discussions and recommendations. Members absented themselves from the meeting during discussion of and voting on applications from their own institutions, or other applications in which there was a potential conflict of interest, real or apparent. Members were asked to sign a statement to this effect.
[Top of Page]
IV. REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS
The Council considered 223 applications requesting $157,377,611 in total direct costs. The Council recommended 223 applications with total direct costs of $157,377,611. A summary of applications can be provided by the Executive Secretary.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 2:10 p.m. on September 9, 2008.
[Top of Page]
|